.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Dilettante's Ball

About Me

LibraryCog
Quædam cuiusdam
Lorcan Dempsey's Weblog
Rawbrick
The Shifted Librarian
planet code4lib
Metafilter

Powered by Blogger

Polishing the turd: the dangers of redesigning the OPAC
So as Art and I continue to try to export the data from our respective Voyager catalogs to create an alternative web opac, I have been trying to formulate what such a beast should look like. We have the opportunity to make the web interface look and behave in any way we want, so there are a lot of things to think about. The goal is to make the opac behave in the way non-information professionals would expect a searching interface to work, so we're not just talking about a cosmetic makeover to the current design.

We just had a professional usability study done on our web site and services. The results were rather sobering. While not every aspect of our web presence is bad, a great deal of it is, and, worse, the bad parts are generally the most important. Making the situation even more complicated is the fact that a lot of these awkward interfaces are not under our control (the databases, ejournals and opac). Well, not currently under our control.

I'll skip over the part about our website (we're able to fix that pretty easily) and write about what they recommended for the catalog. The first screen they gave us was a redesigned search form. An interesting dialogue came out of that:

Usability Expert: Ok, so this is the search form...
Librarian(s): So... is this the simple search form or the advanced search?
Usability Expert: This is the search form.


And it really is as simple as that. It is a text input field that, by default, would do a keyword natural language query on the catalog, or you could add limits and filters (title, author, subject, etc.) or make a more sophisticated boolean search using the exact same form.

The other screen they showed was a full record page for a journal. It was extremely well laid out, but I noticed that it had a lot of visual clues in the page that item you were looking at was a journal. This is another incredibly simple feature. Different types of resources can have their own layout based on what is logical for that type of resource. Also, we could conceivably display electronic holdings from SFX in our opac interface, so the user doesn't have to click on the SFX button (or generic 856 link) and open the SFX window to see if an issue is available electronically. We could also, at this point, give recommendations of other resources that might be valuable (such as A&I databases that this particular journal appears in).

The usability study was extremely useful for looking at the opac through non-library eyes, but with a view focused on making things more useful.

Last week I began trying to visualize how to lay out search results. The initial design, I think, will look something like:
Your search for "Ernest Hemingway" resulted in:
167 Total Items :: 102 Books :: 50 Videos :: 2 Journals :: 13 Audiobooks :: 1,072 Items from GIL Express

With each of those being tabs to view different types of resources (plus a link to our state union catalog at the end). The goal is to be somewhat A9-ish, but I can't say I'm a huge fan of the column layout.

I am, however, a huge fan of the folksonomy. I definitely plan on implementing user-supplied subject headings. We want to implement a del.icio.us style social bookmarking/citation management system here anyway (probably using unalog), and it seems like this would fit in quite well with that. I wouldn't actually expect users to just add "tags" to things without some sort of personal gain, so if it was incorporated into a "bookbag" system, it might actually get used. Although the idea of just leaving breadcrumbs around the opac (and databases) might be useful if they don't want to clutter up their bookmark pages with a ton of items. This is something that we can play around with. Mark Leggott talks about adding folksonomic support in the University of Winnipeg's alternative opac project, as well. Interestingly, I had no idea Mark was working on something like this (rob caSSon, at the University of Miami, Ohio, is also working on a similar project. Miami and Winnipeg are both III sites; perhaps they should get in touch with each other).

Over the weekend (yes, I get a touch obsessed about my job), I began thinking about the utility of displaying dust jackets in the opac. When I was designing a new books list application at Emory, it seemed "obvious" to include dust-jackets in the results. I mean, that's what Amazon does and it's user-friendly, right? Well, while I was thinking about it this weekend, I started wondering how useful this really was. What is the purpose of showing the dust jacket? It certainly won't help the user much if they go into the stacks to find the book... we rebind everything in those boring red/green/gray/"khaki" bindings, with no indication of what the original dust jacket looked like. If anything, this seems like it might be more confusing to the user.

Something that seemed so "obviously necessary" in a modern opac 12 months ago now seems pretty frivolous and would just add unneeded clutter to what will probably already be a fairly cluttery interface.

I'm sure this design will continue evolving, but it's got to start somewhere.

18 Comments:

At 4:59 PM, May 10, 2005, Blogger AKMA said...

A visual representation of cover color and dimensions, though, might be helpful; some of us really do look for books based on visual cues.

 
At 9:56 AM, May 12, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmm, any chance you can give some insight in how you decided which usability expert to go with? I would love to see a paper on this whole project *nudge nudge, wink wink*. I understand the fustration of being stuck with certain interface designs that are in the code.

 
At 1:49 PM, May 12, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The dustjacket might help someone recognize a book they saw in a store, or see that one book called 'Forests' is probably a kid's book but another is for serious grownups; etc. etc.

 
At 11:32 PM, May 16, 2005, Blogger Ross said...

More on the usability study later...

In regards to the dust jackets: in theory, I agree completely. In fact, until a week ago, I thought that any OPAC worth its salt nowadays would have dust jackets for the same reasons expressed here... pattern recognition.

However... how would this work for anything other than current releases? It may, indeed, be useful for recently acquired items, before they are rebound. You see, I work in an academic library at an engineering school. A vast percentage of our collection isn't even monographs, and those that are... They have been bound in institutional green, red, tan, and blue. There is no trace of their original dust jacket. So, a dust jacket offers little help to the user trying to find the item in the stacks.

As far as the other way pattern recognition would be useful, remembering a particular book you've seen: my copy of 1984 at home looks like this, not the defaults Amazon.com shows.

My copy of A Farewell to Arms looks nothing like any of the copies Amazon has.

Not even close (Three Plays: Blood Wedding/Yerma/the House of Bernarda Alba).

No image. (The Development of European Society, 1770-1870 -- Just as well, it's just green with white text.)

I guess my point is... is this much of a help at all?

What would be much more of a help would be abstracts or summaries of the resource, in my opinion, rather than images.

Note: I think dust jackets would probably be more useful for a public library.

 
At 8:46 AM, May 17, 2005, Anonymous bridgett said...

The visual representation is not about finding a book on a shelf. It is about finding a book in an Online Catalog. Browsing the stacks of an academic library may not be appropriate since we tend to rebind our books for preservation reasons. However, I think that often for a library user, the online catalog doesn't give enough information to help choose one book over the other.

The visual clues given from the dust jacket allow you to see what kind of book it is, hopefully, aside from the table of contents and author info.

 
At 1:55 PM, October 11, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi, I was searching blogs and came onto your fantastic blog.

I have a niche site. It pretty much covers how make money with plant you site at the top
marketing
.

Keep it up. I'll check back later, I'm sure.

 
At 11:18 PM, October 19, 2005, Blogger Greg said...

Hi, I was searching blogs and came onto your fantastic blog.

I have a niche site. It pretty much covers how make money with submit yahoo zeal DMOZ
marketing
.

Keep it up. I'll check back later, I'm sure.

 
At 9:24 PM, October 25, 2005, Blogger Greg said...

Hi,

you really have a very nice blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a site dealing with prevention traffic loss change of domain name
. You are heartly invited to take some really good tips from it.



Come and check it out if you get time :-)

TheSEO-Rank.com

 
At 8:09 PM, November 01, 2005, Blogger Steve Westphal said...

Great blog, you can get more info on make money teen ways
here.

 
At 4:11 AM, November 02, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you! The information and Internet marketing product evaluations that you provide are great for beginner webmasters.

I have a make money site/blog. It pretty much covers make money related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

 
At 4:32 PM, November 04, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I admin, the title of the book nailed me, but the claim to be able to make $1,000 in 48 hours made me wonder. But I bought the book and just finished reading it and now I believe it's possible. Has anyone else read Desperate for money and tried some of the ideas?

 
At 9:45 AM, November 05, 2005, Blogger Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a reciprocal link management site/blog. It pretty much covers reciprocal link management related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

 
At 6:47 PM, November 05, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"No Charge Online Advertising Channels For Any Business"

 
At 3:36 AM, November 06, 2005, Blogger TheDevilIsInTheDetails said...

appraisal domain nameGreetings! I have to say that I'm quite impressed that your blog ranks so highly for appraisal domain name . Because it does (And I'm wacky like that) I thought it might be beneficial to point out this resource for appraisal domain name

 
At 11:55 PM, November 06, 2005, Blogger mwcart said...

Hello. Do you know the you can Denver Internet Marketing
online. The internet is the perfect place to find Denver Internet Marketing
. Great blog, keep up the good work.

 
At 11:30 PM, November 08, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not much to say besides the fact that coming to Register Better would be a good decision in regards to cheap domain name registration !

 
At 6:01 PM, April 21, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You've got a lot of spam comments, there...

I (an actual person) *did* read this entry and say: "where do I sign up?" It's so ironic that the primary tools of information professionals in information organizations tend to be so godawful.

 
At 5:48 AM, October 04, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Before starting to write about web, I had nothing to write about. However, once started, there was nothing to stop me!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home