SRW/U is to
Yngwie J. Malmsteen as
OpenSearch is to
Keith Richards.
Yngwie Malmsteen is technically superior, however aesthetically unlistenable (unimplementable, in the case of SRW/U).
Keith Richards is sloppy, unsophisticated and writes
timeless melodies that resonate with the masses (OpenSearch is sloppy, unsophisticated -- while time will tell if OpenSearch becomes "timeless" [seems doubtful, honestly], but there are certainly a lot of
OpenSearch targets).
Mike Taylor wrote
a very insightful reaction to
Dan's worklog posting (and incredibly objective, given his investment and relationship to SRW/U). And he's right.
And I'm right. Unless SRW/U can capture some of the mojo that OpenSearch has, it might as well be Yngwie J. Malmsteen.
1 Comments:
I don't know much about SRU/W (yet) but I believe an OpenSearch Description document could list an SRU response as the (or one of the) available responses
Post a Comment
<< Home